AnsweredAssumed Answered

SPI peripheral: BSY bit stuck after transmission

Question asked by Sven Pauli on May 20, 2018

On an STM32F103 nucleo board I occasionally find my program locked in a loop waiting for the SPI2's BSY bit to become cleared.

 

I am, honestly, totally clueless what is happening here. I am hardly able to track down the issue. What I found out so far:

 

Errata: There might be the possibility of a silicon issue. I found a couple of related discussions:

 

Optimization: The issue arises depending on the level of optimization requested from the (official) ARM-GCC. The code in question is:

static void txbuf(uint8_t *data, uint16_t n)
{
    while (n--) {
        while (!(SPI2->SR & SPI_SR_TXE));
        SPI2->DR = *data++;
    }
}

 

What happens is that with optimization turned off everything works. With -O1 or -O2 enabled I found out that the SPI peripheral is actually generating 16 clocks per iteration of the loop. In the disassembly this translates to

08002008:   strh    r2, [r4, #12]

where r4 is the SPI2's memory offset and r2 is the byte to transmit. Everytime I step this instruction in instruction stepping mode I can see 16 clocks on the oscilloscope. I also examined that DFF is 0. Setting DFF to 1 causes it to output 32 clocks per instruction.

 

SPI clock: The SPI2 peripheral is clocked without prescaler from the APB1, which is running at 36MHz. System clock is 72MHz. The SPI clock thus is 18MHz, which I can also observe on the oscilloscope. Choosing a larger prescaler makes everything work at any level of optimization.

 

 

 

Update May 21

waclawek.jan I am using GCC, too, from the official ARM release.

The assembly looks almost the same for any level of optimization chosen:

 8002522:   8923        ldrh    r3, [r4, #8]
 8002524:   f013 0f02   tst.w   r3, #2
 8002528:   d0fb        beq.n   8002522 <command+0x62>
 800252a:   f812 3b01   ldrb.w  r3, [r2], #1
 800252e:   81a3        strh    r3, [r4, #12]
 8002530:   42aa        cmp r2, r5
 8002532:   d1f6        bne.n   8002522 <command+0x62>

r4 is the SPI2 memory base and r2 is the buffer to be transmitted. It first spins until the TXE bit becomes set, then transfers one byte at a time from memory to the DR. The loop I got stuck in then looks like this:

 

255           while (!(SPI2->SR & SPI_SR_TXE));
08002818:   ldr     r2, [pc, #164]  ; (0x80028c0 <sd_enable+172>)
0800281a:   ldrh    r3, [r2, #8]
0800281c:   lsls    r1, r3, #30
0800281e:   bpl.n   0x800281a <sd_enable+6>
256           while (SPI2->SR & SPI_SR_BSY);
08002820:   ldr     r2, [pc, #156]  ; (0x80028c0 <sd_enable+172>)
08002822:   ldrh    r3, [r2, #8]
08002824:   lsls    r3, r3, #24
08002826:   bmi.n   0x8002822 <sd_enable+14>       <--- Stuck here

 

SPI configuration. I think I found out something else. In this application the SPI2 is first configured at 280kHz or so. Then some communication is successfully going on, including the waiting for the BSY flag.

The SPI is then reconfigured to a faster speed like so:

    SPI2->CR1 &= ~SPI_CR1_SPE;
    SPI2->CR1 &= ~SPI_CR1_BR;
    SPI2->CR1 |= SPI_CR1_SPE | BR_TRANS;

And then the weird thing begin.

However, when I insert a NOP instruction between lines 2 and 3 everything is fine. The assembly again looks unsuspicious:

 

732           SPI2->CR1 &= ~SPI_CR1_SPE;
080029b0:   ldrh    r2, [r3, #0]
080029b2:   bic.w   r2, r2, #64     ; 0x40
080029b6:   lsls    r2, r2, #16
080029b8:   lsrs    r2, r2, #16
080029ba:   strh    r2, [r3, #0]
733           SPI2->CR1 &= ~SPI_CR1_BR;
080029bc:   ldrh    r2, [r3, #0]
080029be:   bic.w   r2, r2, #56     ; 0x38
080029c2:   lsls    r2, r2, #16
080029c4:   lsrs    r2, r2, #16
080029c6:   strh    r2, [r3, #0]
734           SPI2->CR1 |= SPI_CR1_SPE | BR_TRANS;
080029c8:   ldrh    r2, [r3, #0]
080029ca:   orr.w   r2, r2, #64     ; 0x40
080029ce:   strh    r2, [r3, #0]

 

If the system clock is twice as fast as the peripheral clock (SYSCLK is 72MHz, APB1 clock is 36MHz) are there any synchronization constraints?

 

 

Any clues appreciated. I will update this with further findings as appropriate...

Outcomes