cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Cannot remove RDP Level 1 lock on STM32N657 Nucleo

YoussefAbdalla
Associate II

Hello,

(ST-LINK + CubeProgrammer UART/USB both failing)

I am using a NUCLEO-N657X0-Q board. I cannot flashing my code via the ST-Link ( ST-Link windows driver is installed and detected through device manager and I had already updated the stlink). it throws this error:

STMicroelectronics ST-LINK GDB server. Version 7.11.0

Copyright (c) 2025, STMicroelectronics. All rights reserved.

 

Starting server with the following options:

Persistent Mode : Disabled

Logging Level : 1

Listen Port Number : 61234

Status Refresh Delay : 15s

Verbose Mode : Disabled

SWD Debug : Enabled

InitWhile : Enabled

 

Target unknown error 32

 

Error in initializing ST-LINK device.

Reason: Unknown. Please check power and cabling to target.

Then tried with CubeProgrammer to connect via STlink but it connects then quickly drops , here is the log :


17:22:24 : STM32CubeProgrammer API v2.20.0 | Windows-64Bits
17:22:39 : UR connection mode is defined with the HWrst reset mode
17:22:40 : UR connection mode is defined with the HWrst reset mode
17:22:40 : ST-LINK SN : 004600433234511233353533
17:22:40 : ST-LINK FW : V3J16M8
17:22:40 : Board : NUCLEO-N657X0-Q
17:22:40 : Voltage : 3.27V
17:22:40 : SWD freq : 8000 KHz
17:22:40 : Connect mode: Under Reset
17:22:40 : Reset mode : Hardware reset
17:22:40 : Device ID : 0x486
17:22:40 : Revision ID : Rev Z
17:22:40 : UPLOADING ...
17:22:40 : Size : 1024 Bytes
17:22:40 : Address : 0x8000000
17:22:40 : Read progress:
17:22:40 : Error: Data read failed
17:22:40 : Warning: Connection to device 0x486 is lost
17:22:40 : Warning: Connection to device 0x486 is lost
17:22:41 : Disconnected from device.
17:22:41 : Disconnected from device.

Since IDCODE access still worked, but flash was blocked, this matched the typical behavior of RDP Level 1. To confirm, I switched the board to BOOT0=1 so it enters the system ROM bootloader (UART/USB), which bypasses user flash and should still allow mass erase. In this mode, CubeProgrammer connected and reported “Chip ID: 0x486, Bootloader v3.1” but also explicitly printed “Device is under Read Out Protection,” and every read/memory command afterwards timed out. This double-checked that the device is indeed in RDP Level 1.
this is the log :

15:09:30:501 : RTS low
15:09:30:502 : DTR Low
15:09:30:507 : Serial Port COM5 is successfully opened.
15:09:30:509 : Port configuration: parity = even, baudrate = 115200, data-bit = 8, stop-bit = 1.0, flow-control = off
15:09:30:510 : No Init bits value is : 0
15:09:30:510 : Sending init command:
15:09:30:510 : #byte 0x7F sent successfully to target
15:09:30:511 : Wait ends after 1 loop, dataready = 1, delay = 0
15:09:30:511 : #ack Received response from target: 0x79
15:09:30:512 : Double ACK issue detected!
15:09:30:512 : Activating device: OK
15:09:30:512 : Board : --
15:09:30:513 : Sending GetID command and its XOR:
15:09:30:513 : #byte 0x02 sent successfully to target
15:09:30:513 : #byte 0xFD sent successfully to target
15:09:30:513 : Wait ends after 1 loop, dataready = 1, delay = 0
15:09:30:513 : #ack Received response from target: 0x79
15:09:30:513 : Received 4 data bytes from target : 0x01048679
15:09:30:513 : Chip ID: 0x486
15:09:30:513 : Sending Get command and its XOR:
15:09:30:513 : #byte 0x00 sent successfully to target
15:09:30:514 : #byte 0xFF sent successfully to target
15:09:30:514 : Wait ends after 1 loop, dataready = 1, delay = 0
15:09:30:514 : #ack Received response from target: 0x79
15:09:30:514 : Received 1 data bytes from target : 0x07
15:09:30:514 : size of bytes in the response: 7
15:09:30:514 : Received 9 data bytes from target
15:09:30:515 : Full received response: 07310001020321311279
15:09:30:515 : BootLoader protocol version: 3.1
15:09:30:515 : #byte 0x11 sent successfully to target
15:09:30:515 : #byte 0xEE sent successfully to target
15:09:30:585 : Warning: Device is under Read Out Protection
15:09:30:586 : Sending GetID command and its XOR:
15:09:30:587 : #byte 0x02 sent successfully to target
15:09:30:588 : #byte 0xFD sent successfully to target
15:09:31:588 : Wait ends after 1 loop, dataready = 0, delay = 1000
15:09:31:588 : Timeout error occured while waiting for acknowledgement.
15:09:31:588 : No response from target received
15:09:31:588 : Error: GETID command not acknowledged!
15:09:31:708 : Reemission of GetID command
15:09:31:708 : Sending GetID command and its XOR:
15:09:31:708 : #byte 0x02 sent successfully to target
15:09:31:709 : #byte 0xFD sent successfully to target
15:09:32:709 : Wait ends after 1 loop, dataready = 0, delay = 1000
15:09:32:709 : Timeout error occured while waiting for acknowledgement.
15:09:32:709 : No response from target received
15:09:32:710 : Error: GETID command not acknowledged!
15:09:32:830 : Reemission of GetID command
15:09:32:830 : Sending GetID command and its XOR:
15:09:32:830 : #byte 0x02 sent successfully to target
15:09:32:832 : #byte 0xFD sent successfully to target
15:09:33:830 : Wait ends after 1 loop, dataready = 0, delay = 1000
15:09:33:830 : Timeout error occured while waiting for acknowledgement.
15:09:33:830 : No response from target received
15:09:33:830 : Error: GETID command not acknowledged!
15:09:33:952 : #byte 0x11 sent successfully to target
15:09:33:952 : #byte 0xEE sent successfully to target
15:09:35:055 : UART PORT CLOSE
15:09:35:098 : Disconnected from device.

So what should be done now exactly? and why is device in Read Out Protection mode in the first place , i ordered the Nucleo-N657X0-Q and this is the first time I am using it out of the box!

I think a full chip erase can help but cannot even do it becaause the connection keeps getting dropped.

Best Regards,
Youssef

 

1 REPLY 1
Aziz BRIGUI
ST Employee

Hello @YoussefAbdalla,

Try setting BOOT1 jumper to 1 to enter into development boot. That should solve the issue (Via ST-Link)

Also refer to STM32N6 Nucleo-144 board (MB1940) - User manual and STM32N6 Nucleo-144 board (MB1940) - User manual for further details on boot modes for STM32N6.

Let me know if this answers your concern.

Aziz


In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on 'Accept as Solution' on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.