cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

STM32f383xx

derek2399
Associate II
Posted on December 08, 2014 at 18:18

Hi 

I am still (trying to learn) learning how to code STM32F devices using Keil MDK and maybe foolishly, made a pcb with a STM32F383CC6 on it.

Firstly how do I use the Keil MDK or CubeMX when it does not appear to recognise STM32F383xx?

Secondly, why is it a 383 when it is has a M4 core?

Thanks for any clues.

Kind regards

Derek

#stm32f378
3 REPLIES 3
Posted on December 08, 2014 at 19:31

You'd probably talk to your Keil support contact and get an appropriate patch, or pick a STM32F3 part which is adequately similar to build your project. Outside the peripheral view in the debugger this is of little import.

The STM32F1 has an Cortex-M3, all the STM32F3 parts have a Cortex-M4F, I'm not sure there's a way to try and rationalize the part# to core#, it's just an exercise that will give you a headache.

Not a lot of data on the STM32F383, what drew you to the part, and wouldn't it have been easier to have started tinkering with a DISCO board?
Tips, Buy me a coffee, or three.. PayPal Venmo
Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
Amel NASRI
ST Employee
Posted on December 09, 2014 at 10:42

Hello Derek,

STM32F383 samples where renamed later ''STM32F378''.

So using Keil or CubeMX, you have to select this part number.

STM32F378 is similar to STM32F373 (with mainly the 16-bit sigma-delta ADCs)

but it operates at 1.8 V +/-8% to be supplied by an external voltage regulator.

More details on the STM32F378CC are available on this page: http://www.st.com/web/catalog/mmc/FM141/SC1169/SS1576/LN1838/PF259874.

Best Regards,

-Mayla-

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

derek2399
Associate II
Posted on December 09, 2014 at 11:30

Thanks both Mayla and Clive1

I only picked it because of foot print size and Farnell stocked it.  They appear to do both the 383 and the 378??

Many thanks for the explanation

Kind regards

derek