cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Problem with CR95HF´s Tag Detection Mode / Wake-Up by Tag Detect

Armin Böss
Associate II
Posted on March 29, 2018 at 10:10

Hi

I have the following problem with above mentioned function:

Every time i command the CR95HF to get in the Tag Detection Mode it wakes up immediately. I get the following response from CR95HF:

00 01 02�?�?

The Command i give the CR95HF is the following:

 char DataOut[16] = {0x07, 0x0E, 0x02, 0x21, 0x00, 0x79, 0x01, 
 0x18, 0x00, 0x20, 0x60, 0x60, 0x64, 0x74, 
 0x3F, 0x08}; 
 //Byte structure Byte content 
(0x07); //Command Idle 
(0x0E); //Length 
(0x02); //WU Source + LFO frequency Source = Tag Detection 
(0x21); //EnterCtrlL Tag Detection 
(0x00); //EnterCtrlH Tag Detection 
(0x79); //WUCtrlL Tag Detection 
(0x01); //WUCtrlH Tag Detection 
(0x18); //LeaveCtrlL Tag Detection / can´t differ from 0x1800 
(0x00); //LeaveCtrlH Tag Detection / can´t differ from 0x1800 
(0x20); //WU Period Time allowed between two Tag Detections 
(0x60); //Osc Start Defines delay for HFO stabilization 
(0x60); //DacStart Defines delay for DAC stabilization 
(0x64); //DacDataL Define lower and higher DAC comparator values 
(0x74); //DacDataH 
(0x3F); //SwingsCnt Numer of HF swings allowed during Tag Detection 
(0x08); //MaxSleep Maximum number of tag detection trials�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?�?

I cant estimate where things go wrong, the Wake Up by low Pulse on IRQ IN works fine and, of course, there is no NFC Tag close to the CR95HF´s Antenna.

Best Regards,

Armin

#cr95hf
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Posted on March 29, 2018 at 17:46

Hello Armin,

It sounds that your CR95HF is not calibrated Did you perform the calibration procedure as mention in the datasheet prior performing the Tag detection setting? I believe that the DAC range is not tuned according your system.

I would suggest to follow the calibration procedure described in the following application note and retest your command.

http://www.st.com/content/ccc/resource/technical/document/application_note/93/7e/d9/bc/44/d4/40/d4/DM00034250.pdf/files/DM00034250.pdf/jcr:content/translations/en.DM00034250.pdf

Hope it will help

Regards

PB

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
Posted on March 29, 2018 at 17:46

Hello Armin,

It sounds that your CR95HF is not calibrated Did you perform the calibration procedure as mention in the datasheet prior performing the Tag detection setting? I believe that the DAC range is not tuned according your system.

I would suggest to follow the calibration procedure described in the following application note and retest your command.

http://www.st.com/content/ccc/resource/technical/document/application_note/93/7e/d9/bc/44/d4/40/d4/DM00034250.pdf/files/DM00034250.pdf/jcr:content/translations/en.DM00034250.pdf

Hope it will help

Regards

PB

Armin Böss
Associate II
Posted on April 03, 2018 at 14:25

Thank you very much, i thought the caibration procedure is something optional for more perfomance.

Regards

Armin Böss